Government Exhibit 3009
| 00001 |
| 1 |
IN RE: |
| 2 |
THE MATTER OF ORACLE'S PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF PEOPLESOFT |
| 3 |
CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND
NO. 22722 |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Washington,
D.C. |
| 8 |
Tuesday,
December 16, 2003 |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Videotaped
Deposition of KEITH BLOCK, a witness |
| 14 |
herein, called for examination in the above-entitled matter, |
| 15 |
pursuant to notice, taken at the offices of the United States |
| 16 |
Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, 600 E Street NW, |
| 17 |
Suite 9500, Washington, D.C, 20530, beginning at 10:10 A.M. |
| 18 |
before Christina Anderson Smith, RPR, a Registered |
| 19 |
Professional Reporter and Notary Public in and for the |
| 20 |
District of Columbia. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 00005 |
| 1 |
PROCEEDINGS |
| 2 |
(10:10
A.M.) |
| 3 |
(Government's
Exhibit 1 was |
| 4 |
marked for
identification.) |
| 5 |
EXAMINATION BY COUNSEL FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
| 6 |
BY MR. SCOTT: |
| 7 |
Q. All right, sir. Could you state your name |
| 8 |
for the record, please. |
| 9 |
A. Keith Block. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 00006 |
| 1 |
Q. All right. So now you understand that we'll |
| 2 |
be asking you a series of questions today designed to |
| 3 |
elicit information pursuant relating to the proposed |
| 4 |
acquisition of PeopleSoft by Oracle. |
| 5 |
A. Right. |
| 6 |
Q. And you are required to, as you are under |
| 7 |
oath, to respond to those questions as truthfully as |
| 8 |
possible. |
| 9 |
A. Uh-huh. |
| 10 |
Q. You have to say yes or no for the record. |
| 11 |
A. Yes. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 00010 |
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Q. All right, sir. Could you give us -- tell us |
| 19 |
who you're currently employed by. |
| 20 |
A. Oracle Corporation. |
| 21 |
Q. All right, sir. And what's your work |
| 22 |
address? |
| 00011 |
| 1 |
A. 1000 Winter Street, Waltham, Massachusetts. |
| 2 |
Q. And how long have you been with Oracle? |
| 3 |
A. Since 1986. |
| 4 |
Q. All right, sir. And very briefly, could you |
| 5 |
describe your educational background? |
| 6 |
A. I have a Bachelor's and a Master's Degree from |
| 7 |
Carnegie-Mellon University. |
| 8 |
Q. And what are those degrees in? |
| 9 |
A. Bachelor's Degree in Information Systems and a |
| 10 |
Master's Degree in Management and Public Policy. |
| 11 |
Q. All right, sir. Beginning in 1986 and coming |
| 12 |
forward to today, could you describe for me briefly the |
| 13 |
positions you've held at Oracle. |
| 14 |
A. Sure. I started out with Oracle consulting as |
| 15 |
a consultant, and worked my way up through the |
| 16 |
management chain holding various management positions, |
| 17 |
running geographic practices; got promoted to vice |
| 18 |
president, moved up the vice president chain running |
| 19 |
industry-specific practices, the CPG industry |
| 20 |
particularly. And about a year ago I was asked to run |
| 21 |
both the licensed sale software sales organizations |
| 22 |
North America, as well as the North American consulting |
| 00012 |
| 1 |
organization. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 00014 |
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Q. All right, sir. And the current position |
| 7 |
that you hold, your title is what? |
| 8 |
A. Executive Vice President North America. |
| 9 |
Q. And your duties and responsibilities, could |
| 10 |
you describe those briefly for us? |
| 11 |
A. I'm responsible for the software sales in the |
| 12 |
North American commercial account base, as well as the |
| 13 |
consulting, both government and commercial, in North |
| 14 |
America. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Q. You may have said this earlier, so I |
| 20 |
apologize. When did you take the -- when did you -- |
| 21 |
were you put in this position? |
| 22 |
A. Approximately a year ago. |
| 00025 |
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Q. All right, sir. Now, then you said under |
| 17 |
the -- in addition to the strategic accounts, there's |
| 18 |
an applications group? |
| 19 |
A. Uh-huh. |
| 20 |
Q. You have to say yes or no for her. |
| 21 |
A. Yes. I'm sorry. |
| 22 |
Q. And the applications group, could you |
| 00026 |
| 1 |
describe for me, first of all, who is in charge of it, |
| 2 |
and then under that person how it's organized. |
| 3 |
A. Okay. Paul Ciandrini is responsible for the |
| 4 |
applications group. And he has an eastern North |
| 5 |
American applications group, a western North American |
| 6 |
applications group, and he has responsibility for the |
| 7 |
applications business group which I mentioned earlier. |
| 8 |
Q. And that applications -- how does that |
| 9 |
applications business unit relate to Mr. Ciandrini's |
| 10 |
sales efforts? |
| 11 |
A. They're deep product experts, and so they'd be |
| 12 |
brought in on a sales cycle to demonstrate deep product |
| 13 |
knowledge or competitive knowledge. |
| 14 |
Q. So, this group would have, under Mr. |
| 15 |
Ciandrini, salesmen, I take it, that go out and call on |
| 16 |
individual accounts? |
| 17 |
A. Yes, that's correct. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 00120 |
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
Q. All right. Well, let me ask you this. |
| 3 |
Describe for me, in as much detail as you can, what the |
| 4 |
software that will be sold to smaller companies, mid |
| 5 |
market companies, the term is used in your documents, |
| 6 |
will consist of? |
| 7 |
A. For applications? |
| 8 |
Q. Yes, sir. |
| 9 |
A. Any company or entity of any size is -- can |
| 10 |
buy the entire E-Business Suite modules within the |
| 11 |
E-Business Suite, the functional groupings -of the |
| 12 |
E-Business Suite. We don't change the software. It's |
| 13 |
the same software. We don't have different versions of |
| 14 |
the software based on company size. |
| 15 |
Q. Are you putting together a version or a |
| 16 |
package of the software to sell to smaller companies? |
| 17 |
A. It's not really a software package. |
| 18 |
Q. Well, what is it? |
| 19 |
A. What differentiates it is pre-configured set |
| 20 |
ups, versions, pre-configured set ups. These are |
| 21 |
service offerings that wrap around the same software, |
| 22 |
so -- and just as a point of clarification, again, that |
| 00121 |
| 1 |
offering, not software, that offering, could be sold to |
| 2 |
a company or entity of 15 million that's a stand alone |
| 3 |
entity, or it could be a division of GE, General Motors, |
| 4 |
Boeing, pick it. But the software is the software is |
| 5 |
the software. We don't modify the software. |
| 6 |
Q. Then what is it you're doing when you put |
| 7 |
together this offering? |
| 8 |
A. Right. |
| 9 |
Q. What's the purpose of it? |
| 10 |
A. The offering is to give customers, certain |
| 11 |
customers, a set of pre-configured software, which oh, |
| 12 |
by the way, is the same software. It's just configured, |
| 13 |
pre-configured, as opposed to drawing on a larger |
| 14 |
project, an opportunity to implement as quickly as |
| 15 |
possible. |
| 16 |
Q. When you say pre-configured software, what |
| 17 |
does that mean? |
| 18 |
A. Those pre-configured set ups that I talked |
| 19 |
about earlier, so there'd be a standard chart of |
| 20 |
accounts in the general ledger module. |
| 21 |
Q. So they will be standard set ups in this |
| 22 |
offering as opposed to the customer having -- when they |
| 00122 |
| 1 |
implement the software, doing customized versions of |
| 2 |
say general ledger, that type thing? |
| 3 |
A. That's generally right. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 00125 |
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Q. Do you understand what's meant by a solution |
| 6 |
in a box? |
| 7 |
A. Solution in a box to me would be a |
| 8 |
pre-configured pre-set up solution. |
| 9 |
Q. Now is the ERP software that you sell to |
| 10 |
larger companies, would you consider that a solution in |
| 11 |
a box? |
| 12 |
A. The ERP software that we sell to any company |
| 13 |
is not a solution in a box. |
| 14 |
Q. Is the package that you're putting together |
| 15 |
now to sell to companies that have simpler needs, would |
| 16 |
you consider this a solution in a box with your |
| 17 |
pre-configured set ups? |
| 18 |
A. I'm sorry. Could you ask the question again. |
| 19 |
Q. You said you're currently putting together |
| 20 |
some application software to sell to companies with |
| 21 |
simpler needs, right? Under Mr. Ciandrini? He is |
| 22 |
putting together some package like that, or at least is |
| 00126 |
| 1 |
responsible for a number of people doing it, right? |
| 2 |
A. Uh-huh. |
| 3 |
Q. Yes. |
| 4 |
A. That's correct. |
| 5 |
Q. Would you consider what he's doing to be a |
| 6 |
solution in a box? |
| 7 |
A. What Paul is heading up is a solution in a |
| 8 |
box. |
| 9 |
Q. And by solution in a box, we mean what again? |
| 10 |
A. Pre-configured set ups of the software. So |
| 11 |
it's the same software, it's just pre-configured and set |
| 12 |
up. |
| 13 |
Q. Does the pre-configuring of the software, the |
| 14 |
solution in a box have any implications regarding the |
| 15 |
time and expense of implementing it? |
| 16 |
A. Yes, it does. |
| 17 |
Q. In what way? |
| 18 |
A. A typical project, broadly speaking, would |
| 19 |
include several phases to it. There would be a strategy |
| 20 |
phase, a requirements definition phase, a design phase, |
| 21 |
a set up and configuration phase, several phases after |
| 22 |
that, build, transition, production, change, management, |
| 00127 |
| 1 |
all that good stuff. |
| 2 |
You still
can go through all those phases |
| 3 |
with set ups in a box. But you can cut down the |
| 4 |
time to do that because you can cut pieces out of |
| 5 |
the strategy phase of a project or the set up and |
| 6 |
configuration phase of a project or the requirements |
| 7 |
phase of a project by essentially giving a |
| 8 |
customer -- here's your set up, here's your system, |
| 9 |
make some minor modifications and you can go. |
| 10 |
Q. So using a set up in a box would be faster |
| 11 |
and cheaper for a customer to implement if they used |
| 12 |
the pre-configured set ups? |
| 13 |
A. It would certainly cut down on the labor and |
| 14 |
time to go live, yes. |
| 15 |
Q. And for, say, your -- in the package for |
| 16 |
the -- that you're -- for pre-configured set ups that |
| 17 |
you're working on now, you haven't worked out the |
| 18 |
pricing of it, I take it, from what you said earlier. |
| 19 |
A. No. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 00128 |
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Q. And you said earlier that you wouldn't |
| 21 |
consider the ERPs, the enterprise software that you |
| 22 |
sell to be a solution in a box, correct? |
| 00129 |
| 1 |
A. Stand alone? No. |
| 2 |
Q. What is different from -- well, first of all, |
| 3 |
what do you mean by the term stand alone in your last |
| 4 |
answer? |
| 5 |
A. Stand alone means it's just the software. |
| 6 |
There is no set up or configuration, it's just the |
| 7 |
software that's on the CD. That's it. |
| 8 |
Q. Is that generally how you sell the enterprise |
| 9 |
software? |
| 10 |
A. Yes, it is. |
| 11 |
Q. As a stand alone? |
| 12 |
A. Yes, it is. |
| 13 |
Q. What is different between the stand alone ERP |
| 14 |
software and the solution in a box? |
| 15 |
A. The solution in a box would include the |
| 16 |
pre-configured set ups. Again, for an example, if you |
| 17 |
have the general ledger, it would have a chart of-- a |
| 18 |
pre-configured chart of accounts. |
| 19 |
Q. And the stand alone software, ERP software |
| 20 |
would not have a pre-configured set up of accounts? |
| 21 |
A. That's correct. |
| 22 |
Q. Why? |
| 00130 |
| 1 |
A. We don't sell it that way. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 00131 |
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Q. And the reason that you're standardizing -- |
| 13 |
doing standardized configurations in the out of the box |
| 14 |
solution in a box package is because you perceive that |
| 15 |
there are some customers who would want the software |
| 16 |
sold in such a manner; is that accurate? |
| 17 |
A. Yes. |
| 18 |
Q. And what's the basis of that? |
| 19 |
Why do you think that? |
| 20 |
A. There are examples of other companies in the |
| 21 |
market who have been able to do this, so we have been |
| 22 |
able to see that there's receptivity to it. Like |
| 00132 |
| 1 |
Salesforce.com. We've also -- customers are always |
| 2 |
interested in implementing faster, cheaper, less |
| 3 |
expensive ways. So if you can give them something |
| 4 |
that's pre-configured and set up, they're always going |
| 5 |
to be interested in that. |
| 6 |
Q. Now, you sell the stand alone ERP software, |
| 7 |
as I understand it, without pre-configured set ups like |
| 8 |
you have in your solution in a box, correct? |
| 9 |
A. We sell it stand alone without the solution in |
| 10 |
a box. |
| 11 |
Q. And without -- and by that statement, that |
| 12 |
means that your stand alone ERP software does not have |
| 13 |
pre-configured -- pre-configured aspects to it that the |
| 14 |
solution in a box does have? |
| 15 |
A. That's correct. |
| 16 |
Q. And so would it be a fair statement that the |
| 17 |
reason you sell the ERP software, stand alone software |
| 18 |
without the number of pre-configured aspects to it that |
| 19 |
are in the solutions in a box is because you understand |
| 20 |
customers, some customers want the ERP stand alone |
| 21 |
software without all those pre-done configurations? |
| 22 |
A. That's correct. |
| 00133 |
| 1 |
Q. And what's the basis for that? |
| 2 |
Why do you
think that? |
| 3 |
A. They may want their-- they may want their |
| 4 |
unique needs. They may feel their business is special. |
| 5 |
They may have something proprietary, competitive |
| 6 |
advantage. Could be a number of things. And they may |
| 7 |
use it -- if we ever gave them or included it, they may |
| 8 |
use it as a jump start to a project. |
| 9 |
Q. They may use what as a jump start to a |
| 10 |
project? |
| 11 |
A. Pre-configured set ups. |
| 12 |
Q. Typically, the folks that you sell the stand |
| 13 |
alone ERP software to today, though, don't buy the |
| 14 |
pre-configured set ups that you have in the solution in |
| 15 |
a box product? |
| 16 |
A. It's not bundled together. |
| 17 |
Q. And do you have -- can you identify any |
| 18 |
instances where you were selling the stand alone ERP |
| 19 |
software where people, in order to jump start the |
| 20 |
project, as you put it, also ask for the solution in a |
| 21 |
box product? |
| 22 |
A. Well, they're not aware of the solution in the |
| 00134 |
| 1 |
box product. |
| 2 |
Q. Why is that? |
| 3 |
A. Well, it's not really generally available to |
| 4 |
the market yet. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 00138 |
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Let me ask
this. Are you familiar with |
| 15 |
the process by which sales of stand alone ERP |
| 16 |
enterprise software are made by Oracle? |
| 17 |
A. Yes. |
| 18 |
Q. And how much do you get involved in the sales |
| 19 |
process? |
| 20 |
A. I'm typically active in a discrete number of |
| 21 |
opportunities playing an executive sponsorship role and |
| 22 |
doing executive selling. |
| 00139 |
| 1 |
Q. What is meant by executive sponsorship role |
| 2 |
in executive selling? |
| 3 |
A. A lot of customers want to sit across from an |
| 4 |
executive and understand what the high level value |
| 5 |
proposition is, what Oracle brings to the table, or on |
| 6 |
risk mitigation, about demonstrating return on |
| 7 |
investment for the client in a corporate commitment. |
| 8 |
Q. Are you also in a position where you are kept |
| 9 |
apprised as of transactions as they're ongoing as to |
| 10 |
what's in the pipe line, what's likely to come in, |
| 11 |
what's likely not to come in, that type of thing? |
| 12 |
A. I track a discrete number of sales pursuits. |
| 13 |
And I also get overall pipe line information and |
| 14 |
forecast information. |
| 15 |
Q. Now, as the process goes forward in selling |
| 16 |
an account, do you also become involved in discussions |
| 17 |
regarding price? |
| 18 |
A. Typically not. And if I do, it's usually at |
| 19 |
the end of a sale cycle. |
| 20 |
Q. How is the pricing for your products, your |
| 21 |
application software licensing done? |
| 22 |
A. It can be done on a suite basis. There's a |
| 00140 |
| 1 |
standard set of prices for the suite. It can be done on |
| 2 |
an employee basis, number of employees. |
| 3 |
Q. So I take it there is a list price for the |
| 4 |
products that you sell? |
| 5 |
A. Yes, there is. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 00142 |
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Q. Now, is the pricing for the -- is it typical |
| 21 |
for, in the pricing of the applications that you folks |
| 22 |
sell, for there to be some discounting off of the list |
| 00143 |
| 1 |
price, however that list price is computed? |
| 2 |
A. Yes. |
| 3 |
Q. And what are the -- are there set or standard |
| 4 |
discounts that can be given by different levels of |
| 5 |
personnel at Oracle? |
| 6 |
A. Yes. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Q. At what levels are there approvals for |
| 13 |
discounts? |
| 14 |
A. I believe there's a discount approval level |
| 15 |
before me, below me. There may be more to be candid |
| 16 |
with you. And there is one above me. |
| 17 |
Q. All right. And what's your level of discount |
| 18 |
that you're authorized to go to? |
| 19 |
A. I believe it's 70 percent. |
| 20 |
Q. And that would be 70 percent off the list |
| 21 |
price? |
| 22 |
A. Right. |
| 00144 |
| 1 |
Q. And the -- who above you has the authority? |
| 2 |
A. Safra Catz. |
| 3 |
Q. And what is her level of authority? |
| 4 |
A. Unlimited. |
| 5 |
Q. And the one below you, who is that? |
| 6 |
A. That would be my direct reports. |
| 7 |
Q. Including Mr. Ciandrini? |
| 8 |
A. Yes. |
| 9 |
Q. And what is his level of discount authority? |
| 10 |
A. I don't know. I believe it's 55 percent, but |
| 11 |
I don't know. |
| 12 |
Q. All right, sir. And then -- and the process, |
| 13 |
I take it, in order for someone to get -- take a |
| 14 |
discount up to your level of authority, they have to |
| 15 |
come to you and seek your dispensation on doing that? |
| 16 |
A. Yes, or my proxy, yes. |
| 17 |
Q. Under what circumstances or what types of |
| 18 |
things would lead you to authorize a discount up to |
| 19 |
your level of 70 percent? |
| 20 |
A. It could be a variety of factors. It could be |
| 21 |
the customer's budget. In today's world the customer is |
| 22 |
driving 99.9 percent of the pricing decisions anyway. |
| 00145 |
| 1 |
It could be recognition of a significant investment over |
| 2 |
time by an existing customer, so we want to reward them |
| 3 |
for their investment in our products. It could be a |
| 4 |
competitive situation. It could be budgetary |
| 5 |
constraints. But again, primarily -the customer |
| 6 |
dictates the price right now. |
| 7 |
Q. A request for approval to a discount at your |
| 8 |
level, do they generally come to you in writing? |
| 9 |
A. They always do. They actually go to an |
| 10 |
account called KB license approvals. |
| 11 |
Q. This is an electronic account, something on |
| 12 |
the computer? |
| 13 |
A. Yes. |
| 14 |
Q. KB license approval? |
| 15 |
A. Yeah. KB underscore license approvals. |
| 16 |
Q. Is that just for ones where your approval is |
| 17 |
sought, or is that all license approvals and discounts? |
| 18 |
A. Anything that needs to go to my level. |
| 19 |
Q. And who maintains that electronic account? |
| 20 |
A. Rich Blotner. |
| 21 |
Q. And what's Mr. Blotner's title and role in |
| 22 |
the company? |
| 00146 |
| 1 |
A. He's part of the operations group. |
| 2 |
Q. All right. You said that sometime you will |
| 3 |
try to reward in giving larger discounts a customer's |
| 4 |
investment over time. What did you mean by that? |
| 5 |
A. We have some customers who have invested a lot |
| 6 |
of money in our technology. They may have bought tens |
| 7 |
of millions of dollars worth of software, and they may |
| 8 |
have bought it at a lower discount, and we may reward |
| 9 |
them for their loyalty. |
| 10 |
Q. And you said that sometimes you will discount |
| 11 |
because of a competitive situation. What did you mean |
| 12 |
by that? |
| 13 |
A. It's a buyer's market right now. And since |
| 14 |
the turn of the century, candidly, it has been. So it's |
| 15 |
very very competitive. Customers have limited IT spend, |
| 16 |
and so it's -- we're all competing. Everybody is |
| 17 |
competing very aggressively, all software vendors. |
| 18 |
Q. All right, sir. Now, in addition to selling |
| 19 |
application software, do you typically sell some type |
| 20 |
of maintenance or support contract? |
| 21 |
A. Yes, we do. |
| 22 |
Q. And how is that priced? |
| 00147 |
| 1 |
A. It's 22 percent of the discounted price of the |
| 2 |
software. |
| 3 |
Q. All right. And why that number as opposed to |
| 4 |
23, 24 or something else? |
| 5 |
A. You know, I couldn't begin to answer that |
| 6 |
question. |
| 7 |
Q. Who set the number? |
| 8 |
A. The Oracle pricing committee. |
| 9 |
Q. And what is that committee made up of? Who |
| 10 |
is that committee made up of? |
| 11 |
A. I don't know all eight members of the |
| 12 |
committee. It's development, some key stakeholders, |
| 13 |
Safra, some other folks, some people in business |
| 14 |
practices who work for Safra. |
| 15 |
Q. The maintenance support contracts, what type |
| 16 |
of services are provided to the customer under those, |
| 17 |
generally speaking? |
| 18 |
A. There's standard support, which allows |
| 19 |
customers to -- I would lump it up into two categories. |
| 20 |
One is that that they receive update rights, so you |
| 21 |
mentioned earlier something about, you know, 1158 as a |
| 22 |
version of the product. Well, the customers are |
| 00148 |
| 1 |
entitled under their support agreement to get 1159 and |
| 2 |
other point releases as well as new versions of the |
| 3 |
product. |
| 4 |
They also get supported from -- if there's |
| 5 |
an issue with the software, or a customer needs |
| 6 |
help, they can log products, product issues or |
| 7 |
technical requests to resolve the issues. They can |
| 8 |
speak to a support customer representative to help |
| 9 |
solve those issues. |
| 10 |
Q. Do the -- do most of your customers, if not |
| 11 |
all of your customers, buy a maintenance and support |
| 12 |
contract when they buy your application software? |
| 13 |
A. Yes. |
| 14 |
Q. Which is it, most or all? |
| 15 |
A. All. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| 00159 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| 16 |
Q. You've used the term partners in reference
to |
| 17 |
them. Do you have some type of formal relationship |
| 18 |
with the Accentures, Bearing Points of the world that |
| 19 |
lead them to promote your software? |
| 20 |
A. One of the things that they actually pride |
| 21 |
themselves on is being vendor neutral. So if you go |
| 22 |
talk to Accenture or DeLoitte or Bearing Point they'll |
| 00160 |
| 1 |
tell you, hey, you know we only act in the best interest |
| 2 |
of the customer, and we're not going to promote |
| 3 |
somebody's software over somebody else. Now, that's |
| 4 |
what they'll say, and that's their stated objective. |
| 5 |
That's why customers go to them to do evaluations. |
| 6 |
Q. What type of relationship do you have with |
| 7 |
them that would lead you to call them partners? |
| 8 |
A. Partner is one of the most over used words in |
| 9 |
the business world, as you probably know. But, we |
| 10 |
would -- we have a very good relationship with them. |
| 11 |
Sometimes we have a contractual agreement so that when |
| 12 |
we work together these are the terms and conditions of |
| 13 |
the agreement. A master services agreement. Mostly |
| 14 |
with our consulting organization, so that if Accenture |
| 15 |
does a project and they use Oracle consultants there's a |
| 16 |
discount on the consulting services. It's the standard |
| 17 |
discount that would apply for every deal that Accenture |
| 18 |
did. |
| 19 |
Q. How do you interreact with say a Bearing |
| 20 |
Point or an Accenture or -- who were the other -- you |
| 21 |
said big five. Who is included in the rest of them? |
| 22 |
A. So Bearing Point, Accenture, DeLoitte, CGNY, |
| 00161 |
| 1 |
Cap, Gemini, Ernst, Young and the big five is I guess |
| 2 |
now the big four because PWC was acquired by IBM. But |
| 3 |
we still -- we still partner with them. |
| 4 |
Q. All right. Now, and when you say you partner |
| 5 |
with them, what is it then exactly that your sales |
| 6 |
folks do in relation to these companies, these systems |
| 7 |
integrators? |
| 8 |
A. Okay. So, for example, Accenture may be asked |
| 9 |
to do an evaluation by a customer. And they typically |
| 10 |
will have multiple teams, they may have multiple teams |
| 11 |
doing evaluations demos, conference room pilots, and |
| 12 |
we'll work with them to help them demo the software, put |
| 13 |
together a solution for the customers. So that's one. |
| 14 |
Another
opportunity is sometimes a |
| 15 |
customer will issue an RFP, request for proposal, to |
| 16 |
a variety of partners and software providers. And |
| 17 |
we may have an agreement with them that says okay on |
| 18 |
this particular deal we're going to work with you |
| 19 |
guys. Or we may work with many. And they may work |
| 20 |
exclusively with us. They may work with many |
| 21 |
software providers. That's how it works. |
| 22 |
Q. When you said in relation to the earlier -- |
| 00162 |
| 1 |
you know, where they might be working, not the RFP |
| 2 |
process, but the circumstances where they may be |
| 3 |
working with multiple teams, demoing and testing the |
| 4 |
software -- |
| 5 |
A. Yep. |
| 6 |
Q. Multiple teams meaning what in that context? |
| 7 |
A. At some point in the evaluation process -- and |
| 8 |
you know, evaluation process goes through many rounds. |
| 9 |
I mean, it's an exhaustive process. It takes a long |
| 10 |
time. Especially, you know, if you're rolling out a |
| 11 |
large portion of any application provider suite. Right. |
| 12 |
And typically
what'll happen is at some |
| 13 |
point the customer will say okay, well, I think |
| 14 |
it's, you know, these guys that I want to go with, |
| 15 |
and so Accenture would say okay, well we're going to |
| 16 |
have a team to work with this vendor, a team to work |
| 17 |
with this vendor, a team to work with this vendor, |
| 18 |
and eventually you get to that stage and then |
| 19 |
Accenture will provide implementation bids for two |
| 20 |
or three or four. |
| 21 |
Q. Okay. So what will happen is Accenture, |
| 22 |
Bearing Point, whomever might set up different teams to |
| 00163 |
| 1 |
work with different vendors -- |
| 2 |
A. Uh-huh. |
| 3 |
Q. -- so that they can run and test the software |
| 4 |
of each of them against the client's requirements and |
| 5 |
see who the best fit is. |
| 6 |
A. That's generally right. |
| 7 |
Q. Are there circumstances where you folks are |
| 8 |
working with say an Accenture or a Bearing Point or a |
| 9 |
CGNY where you know that there are also showing and |
| 10 |
demoing other people's software? |
| 11 |
A. Yes. |
| 12 |
Q. Is that typical? |
| 13 |
A. It's not uncommon. |
| 14 |
Q. And then these companies will typically -- |
| 15 |
will bid to do the implementation work. |
| 16 |
A. Yes. Although, on occasion, if they do the |
| 17 |
evaluation, they're not asked to do the implementation |
| 18 |
work. |
| 19 |
Q. Okay. Do the Big 5 generally have people in |
| 20 |
there capable of doing the implementation work for most |
| 21 |
of the major software vendors? |
| 22 |
A. Yes. |
| 00164 |
| 1 |
Q. And that would be including you? |
| 2 |
A. Yes. |
| 3 |
Q. Can you think of any of the Big 5 who don't |
| 4 |
have the capability of doing implementation work for |
| 5 |
you, Oracle's software? |
| 6 |
A. No. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 00166 |
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Q. Okay. And in the circumstances where the Big |
| 13 |
5 are involved, typically won't there be some document |
| 14 |
which lays out from a technical standpoint performance |
| 15 |
standpoint what the customer's looking for? |
| 16 |
A. Yeah, typically there'll be a high level |
| 17 |
requirements definition. |
| 18 |
Q. Is that -- do -- are RFPs more detailed than |
| 19 |
these high level performance definitions that come |
| 20 |
through the Big 5? |
| 21 |
A. It depends on the customer. |
| 22 |
Q. All right, sir. And in dealing with these |
| 00167 |
| 1 |
circumstances, what type of information does the -- is |
| 2 |
the client giving you making available to you regarding |
| 3 |
what they want? |
| 4 |
A. It could be a number of things. It may be -- |
| 5 |
typically it's the scope of work that they're looking |
| 6 |
for, the scope, the functionality, the scope of work, |
| 7 |
where the software would be deployed. It could be -- it |
| 8 |
could run the whole gamut. |
| 9 |
Q. Well, is there -- are these things fairly |
| 10 |
uniform in the scope of work that you get from clients? |
| 11 |
A. No. |
| 12 |
Q. And why is that? |
| 13 |
A. Broadly speaking, there are probably |
| 14 |
categories of things that they will ask about. But |
| 15 |
every customer is different. |
| 16 |
Q. Broadly speaking -- when say they're broadly |
| 17 |
speaking, there are categories of things that customers |
| 18 |
will ask about, in doing that scope of work type of |
| 19 |
document, what types of things typically will be in |
| 20 |
such a document? |
| 21 |
A. Oh, it might be things like functionality. It |
| 22 |
may be platform that you run on. It may be we want to |
| 00168 |
| 1 |
see your references. It may be -- I mean, things like |
| 2 |
that. |
| 3 |
Q. All right. So typically, then, in the scope |
| 4 |
of work document you will get, one, from a client when |
| 5 |
you're going in to sell enterprise software something |
| 6 |
that describes the functionality they're looking for |
| 7 |
and the software that they want to acquire, right? |
| 8 |
A. Yes, at a high level. |
| 9 |
Q. And by high level, what do you mean? |
| 10 |
A. It's not detailed requirements. I mean |
| 11 |
typically what happens is that the customer has a |
| 12 |
statement, a broad statement of requirements where they |
|
|