This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

Government Exhibit P3062 [Non-designated testimony redacted]

00005
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
21Q   Okay. And can you please state your full
22name and address for the record, sir?
23A   Richard Scott Elliott, 410 North Mercedes
24Drive, Norman, Oklahoma 73069.
  

00008
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
15Q   Mr. Elliott, what is your current job
16title?
17A   Human resources portfolio manager for --
18or in information management and technology.
19Q   And who is your current employer?
20A   Kerr-McGee Corporation.
21Q   And how long have you held this position
22at Kerr-McGee?
23A   Three years and a few days.
24Q   And can you please give me a general
25description of your job responsibilities in your

00009
1current position?
2A   Sure. I manage a group of IT
3professionals that supports several of our
4corporate clients, human resources, legal and
5medical groups.
6Q   How many IT professionals do you manage?
7A   Eight other folks besides me.
8Q   And how many of those report directly to
9you?
10A   All of them.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
18Q   Do you also do any work that would
19support the financial aspect of Kerr-McGee?
20A   No, that's handled by another group in MI
21& T.
22Q   Is there another person who would be
23considered your counterpart that handles the
24financials?
25A   Yes.

00010
1Q   And who is that?
2A   Bryan Wilks.
3Q   And what's his position?
4A   Portfolio manager as well for financial
5systems.
6Q   And do your job responsibilities also
7include responsibility for software procurement?
8A   In an advisement capacity, yes.
9Q   What do you mean when you say in an
10advisement capacity?
11A   Our strategy at Kerr-McGee is that our
12customers are the ones who drive software
13procurement decisions and we are advisors to them
14in that process.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00011
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
17Q   Are you also responsible for working to
18insure that Kerr-McGee gets the best deal that it
19can on software procurement?
20A   We act in different roles depending on
21the, depending on the procurement activities.
22Q   Is it ever a goal to try to get the best
23value or best price that you can on software
24procurement?
25A   Always.

00014
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
9Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) Can you explain to me
10generally what the nature of Kerr-McGee's
11business is?
12A   Yes. Again, back to our two main lines
13of business, oil and gas exploration and
14production and then chemical manufacturing. Our
15main product is titanium dioxide, a pigment. We
16do produce a few other electrolytical chemicals
17and for a short period of time we still have a
18small business producing railroad ties. It's
19being phased out at the end of this year.
20Q   And does Kerr-McGee have any
21operations -- or let me ask it this way. In what
22geographical areas does Kerr-McGee have
23operations?
24A   We have operations, I don't know how many
25states, but across the United States and to my

00015
1knowledge we have operations in Brazil, Bonine,
2Morocco, Australia, China, the Netherlands,
3Germany, the UK. Those are the major ones.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00018
  
2Q   So given the definitions that you've just
3given me, does the oil and gas division have
4independent authority for procurement of any ERP
5software?
6A   In my experience at Kerr-McGee, those ERP
7software decisions have been global decisions,
8not business unit specific.
9Q   And what do you mean by global decisions?
10A   We, our preferred strategy at Kerr-McGee
11is to have for each major functional area one
12global supplier of software. In financials we
13have one, in HR we have one. We have not been
14able to accomplish that yet in the supply chain
15side to my knowledge.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00031
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
18Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) And how would you
19define core functionality on the financial
20management side?
21A   The general ledger, accounts payable.
22There are a variety of for us revenue or I should
23say upstream oil and gas specific accounting
24functions that would be core for us. I'm sure
25there's a variety of others that could be listed,

00032
1but those are the ones that are main ones for us
2in my opinion.
3Q   Do you know what any of those oil and gas
4specific accounting functions are?
5A   Some.
6Q   Can you name them for me?
7A   One would be -- the two major items are
8tracking production and then tracking the revenue
9that we receive for production.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00033
1Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) Would these
2accounting functions you've just named, tracking
3the production and tracking revenue, are those
4functions that are specific to an oil industry or
5to an oil company?
6A   That's not my area of expertise, but it
7would seem to be so because that is oil and gas
8production and oil and gas revenue.
9Q   Which software vendors offer core
10financial management functionality?
11        MR. HAMMAKER: Objection, vague and lacks
12foundation.
13        THE WITNESS: I don't know the complete
14list. Again, not my area of expertise or
15responsibility.
16Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) Do you know some?
17A   Yes.
18Q   Which ones would you name?
19A   The ones I can specifically name would be
20PeopleSoft, Oracle, Lawson and SAP.
21Q   And with regard to human resources
22management core functionality, which vendors
23offer HR core functionality?
24A   Again, I don't know the complete list,
25but I would list the same four.

00034
1Q   Any others?
2A   It's my understanding that Microsoft
3purchased Great Plains, which I believe offers in
4name at least those core functionality.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
25Q   But you don't have the same level of

00035
1knowledge about Lawson, SAP or Microsoft that you
2do about Oracle and PeopleSoft?
3A   The Oracle and PeopleSoft knowledge is
4more current than the other two because we did
5not -- or the other three. We did not have
6detailed evaluations of Microsoft and of SAP
7during our selection process. Lawson I do have a
8feel but not detailed modules or detailed
9functionality.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00039
  
  
3Q   Mr. Elliott, who would you name to be the
4foremost ERP software vendors currently?
5        MR. HAMMAKER: Objection, vague, lacks
6foundation.
7        THE WITNESS: Based on our process and a
8review of Gartner recommendations, the same four
9I listed previously, PeopleSoft, Oracle, Lawson
10and SAP.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00040
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
8Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) And in your opinion
9what factor or factors drive innovation in the
10software industry?
11A   I would list competition, business
12environment changes, customer demands, regulatory
13changes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00041
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
10Q   Do you consider Kerr-McGee's ERP software
11needs to be complex?
12A   Yes.
13Q   Do you consider them to be unique?
14A   No.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00042
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
23Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) Mr. Elliott, what
24core financial management software does
25Kerr-McGee use?

00043
1A   Oracle.
2Q   And --
3A   And Energy Extensions from P2ES.
4        THE REPORTER: P2BS?
5        THE WITNESS: ES.
6Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) Do you know what
7modules it uses from Oracle on the finance side?
8A   I do not know for sure.
9Q   And what is Energy Extensions?
10A   To my knowledge that deals with all of
11the oil and gas specific revenue accounting
12including production.
13Q   Would you consider that a point solution?
  
  
  
17        THE WITNESS: I really could go either
18way on that. It's integrated with Oracle. I
19think, my opinion would be that it is not.
  
  
  
23Q   And why would it not be considered a
24point solution in your opinion?
25A   Oracle integration.

00044
  
  
  
  
5Q   Is the Oracle financial management
6software used in both the oil and gas and the
7chemical manufacturing business units?
8A   Yes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00045
  
2Q   Are there any business units within
3Kerr-McGee that use some other financial
4management software besides Oracle?
5A   If there are I don't know.
6Q   Do you know when Oracle financial
7management software was initially purchased or
8licensed?
9A   Prior to the year 2000.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
18Q   Do you know what languages Kerr-McGee
19operates the Oracle financial management software
20in?
21A   I do not.
22Q   And do you know what currencies are used
23on the Oracle financial management software, if
24there are any foreign currencies used?
25A   I'm sure there are, but I don't know

00046
1specifically what we use.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
17Q   We'll shift to the HR side now.
18What core HR software does Kerr-McGee
19currently use?
20A   PeopleSoft.
21Q   And is the PeopleSoft software used in
22all geographic regions where Kerr-McGee operates?
23A   Yes.
24Q   And are there any business units that do
25not use the PeopleSoft HR software?

00047
1A   No.
2Q   And when was the PeopleSoft HR software
3initially purchased or licensed?
4A   2001.
  
  
7Q   And do you recall how much Kerr-McGee
8paid PeopleSoft?
9A   There are documents that support this. I
10believe the license fees were in the neighborhood
11of 1.5 million.
12Q   And did Kerr-McGee pay PeopleSoft any
13implementation fees?
14A   No. They were not our implementation
15partner.
16Q   And does it currently pay PeopleSoft,
17does Kerr-McGee currently pay PeopleSoft any
18maintenance fees?
19A   Yes.
20Q   And how much does it pay in maintenance
21fees?
22A   This year it will be approximately
23360,000,I believe, this year.
24Q   Do you know what it has been in previous
25years since the implementation?

00048
1A   Yes.
2Q   What has it been?
3A   The first year was 300,000, succeeding
4year was around 330 and then I believe about 345.
5Q   That brings us to this year, which was
6360?
7A   Uh-huh.
8Q   What version of the PeopleSoftHR
9software does Kerr-McGee use?
10A   Is there a specific module that you're
11asking about?
12Q   I guess we should back up. Which modules
13were licensed?
14A   We have HR, we have time and attendance,
15we have licensed payroll, benefits
16administration, data warehouse. There are three
17analytic suites that we have licensed, Workforce
18Analytics, Score Card and Rewards. In case I'm
19missing any of these there's a document in our
20material that reflects all of them. Employee and
21manager self service and a variety of E modules
22such as compensation, recruiting, compensation
23manager, E pay.
  
  

00049
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
10Q   In which languages does Kerr-McGee
11operate the PeopleSoft HR software?
12A   Currently English, German and Dutch.
13Q   And do you have any plans to operate it
14in any additional languages?
15A   Not at the moment.
16Q   And in which currencies, if there are any
17foreign currencies involved, does Kerr-McGee
18operate the PeopleSoft HR software?
19A   Foreign is highly dependent on where you
20are, but if you're talking non U.S. currencies --
21Q   Non U.S., yes.
22A   Yes. We -- I'm sorry, we also use
23French. For -- we use the pound in the UK, we
24use the euro, we also use the Swiss frank, we
25also have a Canadian dollar. And I believe

00050
1that's it. I think the rest of our folks are ex
2pats, and so it would be the U.S. dollar.
3Q   Are these foreign currencies that you
4named, are those currencies in which employees
5are being paid?
6A   Yes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00051
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
8Q   Is there any other human resources
9management software that Kerr-McGee uses?
10A    No. We have one global instance.
11Q   Do you use any software from any of the
12following vendors? And I'm going to go down the
13list. Do you use any software from SAP?
14A   Kerr-McGee does not. We contract for
15payroll processing in Germany with a company who
16does.
17Q   What do you mean when you say you
18contract for payroll processing?
19A   We pay a fee each year for a company to
20produce payroll checks for us in Germany.
21Q   Is that similar to outsourcing payroll?
22A   It's outsourcing the production of
23checks.
24Q   But would you consider it outsourcing of
25the payroll function?

00052
1A   No.
2Q   Just the check process?
3A   We take care of the function, they
4produce the checks. It's not BPO.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
14Q   Do you use Hyperion?
15A   I believe we do for some financial
16planning, but I am not 100 percent certain.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00053
  
  
  
  
  
  
7Q   And do you use any software from ADP
8aside from the payroll processing in Germany?
9A   We outsource payroll, check production to
10ADP in the United States. And there is a piece
11of software that lives at our site that enables
12that to happen.
13Q   Do you outsource any other part of the
14payroll function aside from check processing?
15A   ADP handles production of checks, direct
16deposits, tax filing. Other than that we do all
17of the process work ourselves.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00054
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
8Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) I'd like to ask you
9now about the process through which you selected
10PeopleSoft for HR software.
11A   Okay.
12Q   When did that process begin?
13A   The actual selection process began
14shortly after my arrival at Kerr-McGee, which
15would be June 2001.
16Q   And who was the primary person
17responsible for the selection of new HR
18management software?
19A   The lead person would have been Lynda
20Garcia.
  
  
  
  
  

00055
1Q   Is she still with Kerr-McGee?
2A   She is.
3Q   Do you know what her title is now?
4A   I do not. She's in the finance
5organization.
  
  
  
  
  
11Q   And do you know if Ms. Garcia was the
12person who managed the project on a day to day
13basis?
14A   The selection project?
15Q   Yes.
16A   She was, she was our lead person on the
17Kerr-McGee side.
18Q   Did she have any title associated with
19the selection process such as project manager or
20something similar?
21A   Not that I'm aware of.
22Q   And what was your involvement in the
23selection process?
24A   I was the I think technical lead was the
25official title.

00056
1Q   And what did that mean in practical
2terms?
3A   Practical terms, I managed our group of
4individuals from the IT side that participated in
5the selection process. I also participated in
6day to day activities such as question formation,
7reviewing demonstrations, doing research if
8required.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00057
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
8Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) And what do you
9recognize this document to be? And let me just
10say for the record, this document appears to be a
11Power Point, on the front it's entitled
12Kerr-McGee HR Financial Analysis, Employee
13Service Center and HRIS dated September 2001 and
14Bates labeled Kerr-McGee 008 through 040.
15        Mr. Elliott, what do you recognize this
16document to be?
17A   This document is a summarization of the
18HR strategy that our HR organization was pursuing
19in 2001.
  
  
  
  
  
  

00058
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
24Q   The first one says project consultants,
25Scott, Madden & Associates. And who was Scott,

00059
1Madden & Associates?
2A   An HR consulting firm.
3Q   And what was their role on the HR
4software selection process?
5A   It's described well here. They were
6facilitators for the process.
7Q   And what did they do as facilitators?
8A   A facilitator, possibly coordinator is an
9equally good term. They organized the work
10products, facilitated discussions, facilitated
11planning, were responsible for not only the HRIS
12side but integrating it into the larger HR
13strategy that this document represents. And that
14was their sole involvement. As it states here,
15they do not have or at least did not have at that
16time an HRIS implementation practice.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00060
  
2Q   Why did you feel it was necessary to
3engage a consultant to assist in this process?
4A   I can't answer for Lynda.
5Q   Was it Lynda who made the decision to
6engage Scott, Madden?
7A   It was the HR organization as a whole and
8Lynda was our point person.
9Q   And who was the main point person for
10working with Scott, Madden?
11A   Lynda and I were both part of the, quote
12unquote, project office, but Lynda was our point
13person on the project within.
14Q   Do you know how much Kerr-McGee paid
15Scott, Madden for its consulting services?
16A   I do not.
17Q   Would Lynda know?
18A   It's been a while. You'd have to ask
19her.
  
  
  
  
  
25Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) Now, next on this

00061
1list it says HRIS project office.
2A   Uh-huh.
3Q   Do you know what that term means?
4A   I know what it means with regards to our
5selection process.
6Q   Sure. What was the HRIS project office?
7A   Would you like me to read it straight off
8the document?
9Q   No. I would like to know, you know, what
10you know. If the document helps to refresh your
11recollection, that's fine, but I'd like you to,
12you know, testify based on your knowledge.
13A   My view of the HRIS project office, the
14responsibilities again are listed here
15specifically. We as a group were responsible for
16coordinating, well, the execution of the project,
17obtaining resources, doing the visits as we
18discussed. There were a lot of discussions
19regarding what questions would be asked, what
20weighting would be assigned to each one of the
21criteria, how the RFPs or RFIs would look after
22they were issued and we were facilitators,
23coordinators on all those. My personal main task
24was to coordinate the technical resources
25involved.

00062
1Q   Were you a part of the HRIS project
2office?
3A   Yes.
4Q   Who else was a part of the HRIS project
5office, do you know who made up that group?
6A   Lynda Garcia was the main person and
7officially we included Scott, Madden as a part of
8the project office.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
25Q   And then these boxes here on Page 7, you

00063
1said these are all people who participated in the
2process?
3A   Yes.
4Q   Anda are these all groups that would be
5end users of the software?
6A   Yeah.
  
  
  
  
11Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) How were these people
12selected to participate in the selection process?
  
  
15        THE WITNESS: I don't recall the exact
16process we went through to choose the folks. The
17goal was to have people representing as many
18different areas in the HR organization as we
19could and plus involve technical people in from
20several of our major areas as well.
21Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) Who selected these
22people who were participants in the software
23selection process?
24A   I'll go back to my previous answer. I
25don't know the exact details of how we selected

00064
1these people. As I look through here it was I
2believe my recommendations on the technical side
3to say these are the people that need to
4participate based on their areas of expertise.
5Q   And was Lynda Garcia responsible for
6selecting the other people involved here?
7A   I'll say again, I don't know the details
8of how they were selected.
9Q   But you selected the people listed in
10this box labeled technical who are here under
11your name?
12A   Yes.
13Q   And are those the people you referred to
14earlier who you were responsible for managing
15throughout the selection process?
16A   For this process, yes.
17Q   Were you responsible for managing anyone
18else on this chart?
19A   No.
20Q   Was Lynda Garcia responsible for
21coordinating the other people in these other
22boxes on this page?
23A    Yes. She served as the functional lead,
24if you will.
  

00065
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
24Q   Can you tell me what, what the role of
25subject matter experts was in this process?

00066
1A   As I recall, basically the document says
2input and guidance. Many of these folks would be
3consumers of, as I recall, some of the services
4within the HRIS.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
12Q   Did the -- did the technical team that
13you were responsible for managing meet on a
14regular basis throughout the selection process?
15A    Yes. We had scheduled meetings plus as
16needed meetings depending on what was happening
17in the process.
18Q   Let me back up just a second. How long
19did the selection process take in total?
20A   We started this in June of 2001, the
21contract was signed I believe at the end of
22October 2001.
23Q   And how frequently did the technical team
24meet during that time?
25A   I don't think there was any standard

00067
1number of meetings we had on a weekly basis.
2Q   So you didn't have some kind of regular
3set time for meeting?
4A   No. There was -- as I recall, there were
5group meetings where the entire group met
6together.
7Q   Would that have been the entire --
8A   Core selection team.
9Q   -- core selection team?
10Including your technical team?
11A   Yeah.
12Q   And how frequently were those meetings?
13A   I think it depended on where we were in
14the process. I can't recall the exact schedule.
15Q   Could you estimate the total number of
16times that the HRIS core selection team met over
17the course of the selection process?
18        MR. GORESEN: I'm going to object to the
19extent it calls for speculation.
20        THE WITNESS: Anything I gave you would
21be a guess.
  
  
  
  

00068
  
  
  
  
5Q   And with regard to your technical team,
6can you estimate how many times your technical
7team met on its own throughout the entire
8selection process?
9A   As an estimate, we were visiting maybe
10not in total but at least, you know, two or more
11weekly basis. We did not have a set time where
12we got together as an entire team, only as
13needed.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Q   I'm not going to ask any more questions

00069
1on this document for a little bit.
2        What were the main responsibilities of
3your technical team in this process?
4A   To review, to the extent we could, the
5technical soundness of the proposed solutions.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
23Q   Do you know if any presentation was ever
24made to the CEO or other executives regarding the
25selection of PeopleSoft?

00070
1A   I believe there was.
2Q   And were you part of that presentation?
3A   No.
4Q   Who did that presentation?
5A   I believe Lynda did.
6Q   Do you know when that was?
7A   I do not know the exact date. My surmise
8would be either late September or early October.
9Q   Did you work with Lynda at all in
10preparing that presentation?
11A   Scott, Madden was again the main
12facilitator for producing documents, but I did
13participate with Lynda as well.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00072
  
  
3Q   In addition to Scott, Madden, did you
4consult with any other outside resources as part
5of the selection process?
6A   One would have been Gartner.
7Q   And what was your interaction with
8Gartner Group?
9A    We asked the question who would be their
10I believe the term is magic quadrant vendors with
11regards to the HR space.
12Q   And what did they tell you?
13A   PeopleSoft, Oracle, SAP, Lawson.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

00073
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
13Q   And did you personally have contact with
14someone at Gartner Group?
15A   I did not.
16Q   Do you know who did?
17A   I believe Lynda.
18Q   And do you know if she met with them in
19person?
20A   I do not know for sure.
21Q   Do you know if she had personal contact
22with them at all?
23A    Yes. I know for a fact there was
24definitely a phone visit. At that time we had a
25subscription to their services, so I don't know

00074
1if there was anything else involved.
2Q   Do you know if they provided Kerr-McGee
3with any written research report?
4A   I don't know. Ours was a fairly simple
5and straightforward question.
6Q   So you never saw some written research
7report from Gartner Group?
8A   No.
9Q   So the information that came from Gartner
10Group you got through Lynda Garcia?
11A   Yes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
24Q   At what stage did you make reference
25calls?

00075
1A   After, I believe, the field had been
2narrowed to PeopleSoft and Oracle.
3Q   So you didn't call any references for
4Lawson or SAP?
5A   None.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
25Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) Do you consider

00076
1yourself to be a sophisticated customer of EAS
2software?
3        MR. GOREEN: I'm going to ask for -- are
4you asking if Scott Elliott considers himself to
5be a sophisticated customer?
6        MS. McKINNEY: Yes.
7        THE WITNESS: When it comes to
8Kerr-McGee's needs, yes.
9Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) Could you describe
10for me the main steps in the process of selecting
11the PeopleSoft HR software, if you know?
12A    You have the documents that describe all
13of them. At a high level, again, based on
14Gartner's recommendations, we identified four
15companies that we felt like we should pursue.
16All four companies were contacted to let them
17know that we were actively engaged in a selection
18process. PeopleSoft, Oracle and Lawson
19responded. SAP did not. The request for
20information and detailed questions were
21developed, sent out and received back from those
22three vendors. We had on site demonstrations at
23Kerr-McGee from those three vendors. The RFI
24responses and the presentations were graded by
25the HRIS selection team. Lawson was eliminated

00077
1based on that grading. PeopleSoft and Oracle
2returned for additional demonstration. Two
3visits were made, one to Oracle headquarters, one
4to a PeopleSoft executive gathering. Reference
5calls were made. The team made the
6recommendation to upper management and they
7approved.
  
  
  
  
12Q   Were there any other factors that went
13into developing that list of what four vendors
14Kerr-McGee would consider?
15A   Yeah, there were two other vendors
16that -- I'm not sure, I can't remember the exact
17nature of the research we did, but Baan and J.D.
18Edwards were both considered in addition to those
19four folks. Based on what we could determine, I
20would think primarily from J.D. Edwards website,
21it looked like they lacked the international
22functionality that we thought we needed. Baan
23was in serious financial difficulty prior to
24their acquisition by SSI.
  

00078
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
18Q   And then you mentioned that all four of
19the vendors on your list, Oracle, PeopleSoft, SAP
20and Lawson, were contacted?
21A   Correct.
22Q   In what way were they contacted by
23Kerr-McGee?
24A   I believe Lynda Garcia phoned each one of
25them personally.

00079
1Q   And do you know about what time frame
2this was in?
3A   It would have been in June, I believe.
4Q   And were you on any of those phonecalls
5that Lynda Garcia made?
6A   No.
7Q   Do you know the nature of the phonecalls
8or what she said to them?
9A   Back to my previous, previous answer. It
10would have been that we were actively engaged in
11an HR selection process and we were contacting
12them to solicit their participation and to also
13find out where we should send our request for
14information.
15Q   At the time that she called each of those
16four, do you know if Kerr-McGee intended to send
17each of those four vendors an RFI?
18A   I believe that was our intent.
19Q   And did she ask for any response from
20them during those phone conversations? That is,
21was she seeking any response from them prior to
22sending the RFI?
23        MR. GORESEN: I'm going to object to the
  
  

00080
  
  
3A To the best of my knowledge it was to
4whom and where should we send the RFIs.
5Q And you said that three responded?
6A Yeah.
7Q And which three were those?
8A PeopleSoft, Oracle and Lawson.
9Q And SAP did not respond?
10A   Correct.
11Q   And what does that mean?
  
  
  
  
  
17Q.   (By Ms. McKinney) Does that mean -- did
18Lynda talk to anyone at SAP?
19A   I do not know specifically who she would
20have talked to. They did not provide the
21information which was who should we send the RFI
22to and to where should it be sent.
23Q   Do you know if she, if she was able to
24get anyone on the phone and speak with them?
25A   I do not know.

00081
1Q   Do you know who she tried to call at SAP?
2A   No.
3Q   Do you know if she left a voice-mail with
4anyone at SAP?
5A   I wasn't in on the call. I don't know if
6she talked to a person or left a voice-mail.
7Q   Do you know if she ever sent any written
8communications to SAP?
9A   Not that I'm aware of.
10Q   Do you know if she made any subsequent
11attempts to contact SAP either by phone or
12through written communications?
13A   I believe there was more than one
14attempt. I don't know how many.
15Q   Do you know how long of a time period she
16spent trying to get in touch with SAP?
17A  &n