Skip to main content
Case Document

[Proposed] Order Denying Motions of the New Jersey Division of the Ratepayer Advocate and the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates to Intervene

Date
Document Type
Orders - Miscellaneous
Attachments
217276.pdf
217276.wpd
This document is available in three formats: this web page (for browsing content), PDF (comparable to original document formatting), and WordPerfect. To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,    

                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

SBC Communications, Inc. and
AT&T Corp.,

                  Defendants.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,    

                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

Verizon Communications Inc. and
MCI, Inc.,

                  Defendants.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         
Civil Action No.: 1:05CV02102 (EGS)







Civil Action No.: 1:05CV02103 (EGS)



ORDER DENYING MOTIONS OF THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF THE RATEPAYER ADVOCATE AND THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE UTILITY CONSUMER ADVOCATES TO INTERVENE

Upon consideration of the Motion of the New Jersey Division of the Ratepayer Advocate to Intervene and the Motion of the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates to Intervene for the Limited Purpose of Providing Consumer Views on the Public Interest, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion of the New Jersey Division of the Ratepayer Advocate to Intervene and the Motion of the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates to Intervene for the Limited Purpose of Providing Consumer Views on the Public Interest are DENIED.


Dated: ______________________
 ______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Related Case
U.S. v. SBC Communications Inc. and AT&T, Corp.
Updated April 18, 2023