Skip to main content
Case Document

[Proposed] Order Denying ACTel's Motion for Leave to Supplement Record

Date
Document Type
Orders - Miscellaneous
Attachments
219062.pdf
219062.wpd
This document is available in three formats: this web page (for browsing content), PDF (comparable to original document formatting), and WordPerfect. To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

United States of America,    

                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

SBC Communications, Inc. and
AT&T Corp.,

                  Defendants.


United States of America,    

                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

Verizon Communications Inc. and    
MCI, Inc.,

                  Defendants.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         

Judge Emmet G. Sullivan
Date Filed: October 16, 2006

Civil Action No.: 1:05CV02102 (EGS)





Civil Action No.: 1:05CV02103 (EGS)




ORDER DENYING ACTel's MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD

Upon consideration of ACTel's Motion for Leave to Supplement Record and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support, as well as the record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that ACTel's Motion for Leave to Supplement Record is DENIED.

Dated: _______________________
 _______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Related Case
U.S. v. SBC Communications Inc. and AT&T, Corp.
Updated April 18, 2023