Skip to main content
Case

U.S. and Plaintiff States v. Oracle Corp.

On this page:

Related pages:


Appeals Court Filings

Response of the United States of America to Oracle's Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Moot (June 30, 2004)

Brief for Appellee, the United States of America (June 18, 2004)

District Court Filings

Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order Thereon (September 9, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Closing Argument Presentation (July 20, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Post-Trial Brief [Redacted, Public Version] (July 13, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Proposed Findings of Fact [Redacted, Public Version] (July 8, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Proposed Conclusions of Law (July 8, 2004)

Parties Joint Submission of Definitions (July 1, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Response to Bloomberg News et al.'s Motion to Unseal Exhibits Submitted at Trial (June 15, 2004)

Stipulation Regarding Authenticity and Admissibility of Documents (June 10, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to CapGemini's Motion to Quash the United States of America's Subpoena for Testimony Directed to Lynn E. Anderson (June 10, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Professor Kenneth Elzinga [Redacted, Public Version] (June 8, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Professor R. Preston McAfee [Redacted, Public Version] (June 8, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Professor Marco Iansisti (June 8, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Dale Kutnick [Originally Filed Under Seal, Unredacted by Agreement of the Parties] (June 1, 2004)

Joint Stipulations of Fact (June 1, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Trial Brief [Redacted, Public Version] (June 1, 2004)

Proposed Order Precluding Defendant from Discussing Rdb Database Pursuant to Rule 37(c)(1) (May 26, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendant from Discussing Rdb Database During Trial [Public Version] (May 26, 2004)

Order Setting Hon. Charles A. Legge Hearing (May 21, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Response to Third Parties' Motion Supplementing Existing Protective Order (May 19, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Witness List (May 18, 2004)

First Supplemental Case Management Schedule and Order (April 29, 2004)

First Amended Complaint (April 15, 2004)

Revised Stipulated Protective Order (April 13, 2004)

Joint Case Management Statement and Order (March 15, 2004)

Stipulated Protective Order (March 15, 2004)

Order (March 12, 2004)

Order (March 12, 2004)

Joint Case Management Statement and Proposed Order (March 8, 2004)

Plaintiffs' Statement Regarding Disputed Issues (March 8, 2004)

Defendant Oracle Corporation’s Statement re Disputed Issues (March 8, 2004)

[Proposed] Protective Order (March 8, 2004)

[Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order (March 8, 2004)

Complaint (February 26, 2004)


Case Open Date
Case Name
United States, State of Texas, State of Hawaii, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Minnesota, State of New York, State of North Dakota, State of Connecticut, State of Michigan, and State of Ohio v. Oracle Corporation
Case Type
Civil Merger
Case Violation(s)
  • Horizontal Merger
Industry Code(s)
  • Custom Computer Programming Services
  • Software Publishers
Case Documents
Order   [PDF, ]
Order   [PDF, ]
Complaint   [PDF, ]
Updated January 8, 2016