SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
RASHAD GORDON, MICHAEL EDWARDS,
AND
THE CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS
This Settlement Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into by the City of Houston
("the City"), Michael Edwards, Rashad Gordon, and the United States of America, through the
United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section ("the
Department").
BACKGROUND
This matter was initiated by a complaint filed with the Department by Rashad Gordon, an
individual with a hearing impairment who is represented by Advocacy, Inc. and the NAD Law
Center (Department of Justice Complaint No. 204-74-102). The complaint was filed under title
II of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12134. The complaint
alleges various violations of title II by the City, including allegations that City police officers,
jail officials and court officials do not effectively communicate with people with hearing
impairments. The City disputes the allegations contained in the complaints. The Department is
authorized under 28 C.F.R. Part 35 to investigate this complaint to determine whether the City is
in compliance with title II of the ADA. The City is a "public entity" for purposes of 42 U.S.C.
§ 12132 and the implementing regulations, 28 C.F.R. § 35.104. The Department is authorized to
investigate the facts, issue findings, and, where appropriate, negotiate and secure a voluntary
compliance agreement. Furthermore, the Department is authorized to bring a civil action
enforcing title II of the ADA should it fail to secure a voluntary compliance agreement.
The Department is also monitoring Edwards v. City of Houston, No. H-98-1369 (S.D.
Tex.). Mr. Edwards claims that when he was questioned by a City of Houston police officer, he
was not provided with a sign language interpreter. The officer then arrested him and he was
incarcerated at the City jail. Mr. Edwards alleges that he was not provided with effective
communication that he needed in order to receive life-sustaining medications, and that he was
not allowed to use a telecommunication device for the deaf ("TDD") to call an attorney or his
family. During his first court appearance at the City of Houston municipal court, Mr. Edwards
alleges that he was not provided with an interpreter. Mr. Edwards also alleges that he was not
provided a sign language interpreter when he needed to report a criminal act against him. The
City also disputes the allegations in the lawsuit filed by Mr. Edwards.
AGREEMENT
Because the City, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Gordon and the Department desire to settle this
matter, the parties agree to the following:
- In consideration for the City's performance of its obligations under this Agreement,
the Department agrees to refrain from undertaking further investigation of the complaints
described above or from filing a civil suit based upon the complaints described above.
- In consideration for the City's performance of its obligations under this Agreement,
Mr. Gordon and Mr. Edwards waive, release and covenant not to sue or commence any
proceeding against the City with respect to any matters contained within the allegations in
Department of Justice Complaint No. 204-74-102 or Edwards v. City of Houston, No. H-98-1369
(S.D. Tex.). Mr. Gordon's signature on this Agreement constitutes a request to withdraw with
prejudice Department of Justice Complaint No. 204-74-102.
- According to terms set forth in separate agreements, the City has made or will make
payments to Mr. Gordon, Mr. Edwards and their counsel.
- The City agrees that its policy is that individuals with hearing impairments are entitled
to effective communication -- communication that is equally as effective as that provided for
others without hearing impairments. In order to ensure effective communication with people
with hearing impairments in the City's programs, activities and services, the City agrees:
- To provide, at the City's expense, appropriate auxiliary aids and services,
including qualified interpreters when necessary to provide effective
communication.
- To give primary consideration to the requests of individuals with disabilities in
determining what type of auxiliary aid or service is necessary. "Primary
consideration" means that the City will defer to the individual's request unless the
City has an equally effective alternative (or if the City establishes in writing that
the chosen auxiliary aid or service would result in a fundamental alteration of its
services, programs or activities, or would be an undue financial or administration
burden. In those circumstances, the City shall take any other action that would not
result in such a burden but would nevertheless ensure that, to the fullest extent
possible, individuals with disabilities receive the benefits or services provided by
the City. See 28 C.F.R. § 35.150(a)(3)).
- To notify people with hearing impairments about the provision of auxiliary
aids and services. The City will distribute this information through pamphlets, posters or
other appropriate means.
Provisions Applicable to the City of Houston Police Department
- The City agrees that individuals with disabilities, including but not limited to crime
victims, witnesses to crimes, and people under arrest, are entitled to effective communication --
communication that is equally as effective as that provided for others without hearing
impairments.
- The City agrees that within thirty days of the effective date of this Agreement, it will
designate one or more employees as the City Police Department's ADA Coordinator.
- The ADA Coordinator(s) will serve as a resource to the officers and
employees of the Houston Police Department regarding the ADA.
- The ADA Coordinator(s) will also serve as a resource for members of the
public who have questions regarding the Police Department's procedures for
dealing with individuals with disabilities.
- The ADA Coordinator(s) will know the specific procedures for requesting an
interpreter.
- Within one hundred and twenty days of the effective date of this Agreement,
the ADA Coordinator(s) will:
- attend a seminar concerning a public entity's obligations under title II
of the ADA; or
- view an educational videotape concerning a public
entity's obligations under title II of the ADA. If the ADA
Coordinator(s) elects this option, the educational videotape
will be specified by the Department and the Department
will give the City instructions on how to obtain a copy of
the videotape.
e. The City agrees that the ADA Coordinator(s) will attend a similar educational
seminar, or view a similar educational videotape, annually.
- Grievance procedures. If a person with a disability is dissatisfied with the auxiliary aid
or service proposed or used by the department, the individual may file a grievance with the
Police Department's ADA Coordinator. The ADA Coordinator will attempt to resolve the
grievance within one week.
- The City agrees to adopt a revised General Order 500-13, as Exhibit A, as the formal
policy of its Police Department. The General Order will be included in the manual distributed to
all police officers.
- The City agrees that within fourteen months of the effective date of this Agreement it
will complete training for all classified and dispatch supervisory personnel of the Police
Department (at the rank of Lieutenant and Sergeant, or the civilian equivalents). The training
shall include discussions of:
- The contents of this Agreement.
- General Order 500-13.
- The contents of the document titled, "Commonly Asked Questions About the
Americans with Disabilities Act and Law Enforcement," which is attached as
Exhibit B.
- The identity of the Police Department's ADA Coordinator.
- The City agrees to give notice of General Order 500-13 to every officer and
employee of the Police Department within thirty days of the effective date of this Agreement.
- The City agrees to incorporate instructions on General Order 500-13 into the
standard curriculum of the police academy where its new recruits receive pre-service training.
- The City Police Department agrees to purchase TDDs so that its services, programs
and activities are accessible to people with hearing impairments, as required by 28 C.F.R. § 35.
161. For purposes of this Agreement the Police Department will provide TDDs at the main
Police Administration building, at each of the patrol sub-stations, and at the Central and
Southeast jails.
- The City agrees that within ninety days of the effective date of this Agreement it will
train at least one supervisor for every shift at all Central and Southeast jail facilities and the
Emergency Communications Division in how to operate and maintain TDDs. The City further
agrees to provide annual training on the proper operation of TDDs to at least one supervisor for
every shift.
- The City agrees that within thirty days of the effective date of this Agreement it will
post a copy of the Notice contained in Exhibit C in all places where notices to the public,
employees and job applicants are normally posted.
Provisions Applicable to City of Houston Detention Facilities
- The City agrees that individuals with disabilities, including but not limited to
detainees, visitors to the detention facilities and individuals who place telephone calls to the
detention facilities, are entitled to effective communication -- communication that is equally as
effective as that provided for others without hearing impairments. The City agrees that effective
communication is necessary in all of the detention facilities' services, programs and activities,
including, but not limited to: initial intake, classification, medical screenings, and medical
treatment.
- The City agrees that each detainee with a hearing impairment shall be informed of all
auxiliary aids and services available and shall be informed of the right to place telephone calls
using a TDD. Jail Division Standard Operating Procedure 100/2.25 currently reads, in part, as
follows:
If the deaf person has been arrested for a Class B misdemeanor or greater offense, ask the
deaf person if he wants a certified interpreter (who is not a police officer), see General
Order 500-13 - DEALING WITH HEARING-IMPAIRED INDIVIDUALS.
The City agrees to strike the phrase, "If the deaf person has been arrested for a Class B
misdemeanor or greater offense" from SOP 100/2.25 and replace the word "certified" with
"qualified." An additional sentence will be added to SOP 100/2.25 as follows:
Discuss with the deaf person the nature of the arrest, municipal bonding information,
phone privileges, scheduled court appearances, medical procedures, visitation privileges,
jail security procedures, and meal times.
- Where a qualified interpreter is required for effective communication, the City agrees
to use its best efforts to contact a qualified interpreter within one hour of a request.
- The City agrees that each of the detention facilities will maintain a list of qualified
interpreters, or of the service the detention facilities contracts with to provide qualified
interpreters.
- The City agrees to notify the appropriate municipal court, or any court the Police
Department directly transports prisoners to, that an interpreter is necessary prior to every court
appearance made by a detainee with a hearing impairment.
- The City agrees to purchase TDDs so that the detention facilities' services, programs
and activities are accessible to people with hearing impairments, as required by 28 C.F.R. § 35.
161.
- The City agrees that detainees with hearing impairments have a right to access to
telephone services which is comparable to the access of detainees without hearing impairments.
The City further agrees that all detainees with hearing impairments using a TDD shall have
complete access to a relay service.
- The City agrees that the detention facilities shall provide and maintain closed-captioned television decoders, or built-in decoder televisions, in television viewing areas, so that
individuals with hearing impairments have the same opportunity for television viewing as other
detainees while in television viewing areas.
- The City agrees to install visual fire alarms in all appropriate areas of the detention
facilities. See 28 C.F.R. Part 36, Appendix A, § 4.28.
- The City agrees that any detainee with a hearing impairment who indicates that
he/she has a health problem or need for medication during the intake process will be immediately
brought to the jail health clinic. Clinic personnel will ensure that telephone calls are made on
behalf of detainees with hearing impairments so that necessary medications that are not available
in the clinic are obtained. If effective communication is not possible in the jail clinic, the
detainee will be immediately taken to a hospital for treatment and/or medication. Clinic
personnel will communicate with the hospital to ensure that it is aware that a detainee is being
transported who has a hearing impairment and has communication needs. Clinic personnel will
also take steps to ensure that all relevant jail employees are aware that a detainee has a hearing
impairment and has communication needs.
- The City agrees to give notice of General Order 500-13 and the new standard
operating procedures resulting from this Agreement to every officer and employee of the
detention facilities and jail health clinic personnel within thirty days of the effective date of this
Agreement.
- The City agrees to incorporate General Order 500-13 into the standard training
curriculum provided to new officers. The City further agrees to incorporate General Order 500-13 and the new standard operating procedures resulting from this Agreement into the standard
training curriculum provided to new Jail Division employees. The City's Department of Health
and Human Services shall provide comparable training for all Jail Health Program personnel.
- The City agrees that within thirty days of the effective date of this Agreement it will
post a copy of the Notice contained in Exhibit D in all places where notices to detainees, family
members, visitors and the general public are normally posted, including in the jail's booking
area, the jail's medical clinic, the jail's housing units, and in the lobby of jail.
Provisions Applicable to the City of Houston
Courts System
- The City agrees that the policy of the City of Houston courts system is that an
otherwise qualified participant, including a party, witness, juror, or spectator, who is deaf or hard
of hearing, may not be denied an equal opportunity to participate in, or benefit from, the services,
programs, or activities of the City courts because of the participant's disability or because of the
need for interpreting services.
- The City has developed a written policy, attached as Exhibit E, providing that in
those proceedings where an interpreter is required in order to ensure effective participation by
any individual who is deaf or hard of hearing, the court system will, upon reasonable notice,
secure the services of a qualified interpreter(s), provided that, with regard to spectators,
such services shall not create an undue financial and administrative burden or result in a
fundamental alteration in the nature of the service, program, or activity conducted by the court
system. In those circumstances where the court system believes that the services would
result in such a burden or alteration, the court system shall take any other action that would not
result in such a burden or such an alteration but would nevertheless ensure that, to the fullest
extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the benefits or services provided by the court
system. The City court system shall also be prepared to provide auxiliary aids and services other
than interpreters, such as assistive listening devices or real-time transcription services, where
necessary for individuals with hearing impairments to effectively participate in court
proceedings.
- The City agrees that within ninety days of the effective date of this Agreement, it
will designate one or more employees as the City court system's ADA Coordinator.
- The ADA Coordinator(s) will serve as a resource to other employees of the
court system regarding the ADA.
- The ADA Coordinator(s) will also serve as a resource for members of the
public who have questions regarding the court system's programs and services for
individuals with disabilities.
- The ADA Coordinator(s) will know the specific procedures for requesting an
interpreter.
- Within ninety days of the effective date of this Agreement, the ADA
Coordinator(s) will:
- attend a seminar concerning a public entity's obligations under title II
of the ADA; or
- view an educational videotape concerning a public
entity's obligations under title II of the ADA. If the ADA
Coordinator(s) elects this option, the educational videotape
will be specified by the Department and the Department
will give the City instructions on how to obtain a copy of
the videotape.
e. The City agrees that the ADA Coordinator(s) will attend a similar educational
seminar, or view a similar educational videotape, annually.
- The City agrees that within ninety days of the effective date of this Agreement, each
court will post a copy of the Notice contained in Exhibit F in conspicuous locations, including
but not limited to in each court clerk's office, advising individuals with disabilities of the
procedures to make a request for an auxiliary aid or service, and listing the name, address and
telephone number of the court system's ADA Coordinator.
- The City agrees that official notices of court dates, including but not limited to
tickets, summonses, and other similar notices, will provide notice that if a person with a hearing
impairment needs an auxiliary aid or service, he or she should call a TDD phone line. The City
agrees that the message on the TDD phone line will also include the phone number of the ADA
Coordinator.
- The City court system agrees to purchase TDDs so that its services, programs and
activities are accessible to people with hearing impairments, as required by 28 C.F.R. § 35. 161.
- The City agrees to install visual fire alarms in all appropriate areas of the City court
system's facilities. See 28 C.F.R. Part 36, Appendix A, § 4.28.
- The City agrees that within ninety days of the effective date of this Agreement, the
City will publish the following notice, or an equivalent notice, on two separate occasions in a
legal periodical with City-wide circulation:
In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities
Act, the City of Houston courts system will ensure that any party, witness, juror,
or spectator who is deaf or hard of hearing will be afforded an equal opportunity
to participate in, or benefit from, the services, programs, or activities of the City
courts. In those proceedings where an interpreter is required to ensure effective
participation by any individual who is deaf or hard of hearing, the court system
will, upon reasonable notice, secure the services of a qualified interpreter(s),
provided that, with regard to spectators, such services shall not create an undue
financial and administrative burden or result in a fundamental alteration in the
nature of the service, program, or activity conducted by the court system. In those
circumstances where the court system believes that the services would result in
such a burden or alteration, the court system shall take any other action that would
not result in such a burden or such an alteration but would nevertheless ensure
that, to the fullest extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the benefits
or services provided by the court system. The City court system shall also be
prepared to provide auxiliary aids and services other than interpreters, such as
assistive listening devices or real-time transcription services, where necessary for
individuals with hearing impairments to effectively participate in court
proceedings. If you have questions, please contact [name of individual], the City
court system's ADA Coordinator, at [list telephone number].
- The City agrees that within ninety days of the effective date of this Agreement, it will
distribute a copy of this Agreement and the policy attached as Exhibit E to every judge and court
administrator within the court system.
- The City agrees that within ninety days of the effective date of this Agreement, the
City will conduct training for judges and court administrators on the application of this
Agreement in jury trials and other court proceedings. The City agrees that it will conduct a
similar training on an annual basis.
- The City agrees that it will include the policy attached at Exhibit E in the manual(s)
that govern the administrative procedures of the court system.
General Provisions
- In the event that the City fails to comply in a timely manner with any provision of
this Agreement, the Department may:
- File a civil suit based upon the complaints described above; and/or,
- File a civil action seeking to have the terms of this Agreement enforced in the
appropriate federal court.
- Within one hundred and eighty days of the effective date of this Agreement, the City
agrees to submit a report to the Department describing the actions it has taken to comply with the
provisions of this Agreement.
- The parties agree that this Agreement is neither an admission by the City of any
violation of the ADA, nor an admission by the Department, Advocacy, Inc., or the NAD Law
Center of the merits of any of the City's potential defenses.
- The City agrees that the Department may review compliance with this Agreement at
any time.
- The City agrees that it will not discriminate or retaliate against any person because of
his/her participation in this matter.
- This Agreement is a public document. A copy of this Agreement shall be made
available to any person on request.
- The effective date of this Agreement is the date of the last signature on the
Agreement.
- The term of this Agreement is five years from the effective date.
- This Agreement does not purport to remedy any other potential violations of the
ADA or any other law. This Agreement does not affect the City's continuing responsibility to
comply with all aspects of the ADA.
- The individuals signing this Agreement represent that they are authorized to bind the
parties to this Agreement.
- Failure by the Department to enforce the entire Agreement with regard to any
deadline or any other provision of the Agreement, shall not be construed as a waiver of its right
to enforce other deadlines or provisions of the Agreement.
- This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relating to the
Complaints, and no other statement, promise, or agreement, either written or oral, made by either
party or agents of either party, that is not contained in this Agreement, shall be enforceable.
For the United States:
______________________________ Date: _______________
John L. Wodatch, Chief
L. Irene Bowen, Deputy Chief
Daniel W. Sutherland
Disability Rights Section, Civil Rights Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 66118
Washington, D.C. 20035-6118
For Advocacy, Inc.
______________________________ Date: ______________
William Jonson
Senior Regional Attorney, Advocacy, Inc.
7457 Harwin Drive, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77036
Attorney for Rashad Gordon and Michael Edwards
For NAD Law Center
______________________________ Date: _______________
Marc Charmatz
NAD Law Center
814 Thayer Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Attorney for Rashad Gordon and Michael Edwards
______________________________ Date: _______________
Rashad Gordon
P>______________________________ Date: ____________________
Michael Edwards
For the City
______________________________ Date: ____________________
Tanya Wilder
Assistant City Attorney
Office of the City Attorney
P.O. Box 1562
Houston, Texas 77251
E X H I B I T A
[General Order 500-13]
GENERAL ORDER
Houston Police Department
Issue Date: [Month], 2000
No.: 500-13
Reference: Supersedes General Order 500-13, dated March 31, 1998
POLICY
This General Order establishes procedures for all employees when they encounter persons who are
deaf or hard of hearing.
DEFINITIONS
Auxiliary Aids and Services. Includes qualified interpreters, written materials, notepads and other
effective methods of making aurally delivered materials available to individuals with hearing
impairments.
ADA Coordinator. Departmental representative designated by the Chief of Police who will resolve
grievances concerning the availability and/or use of auxiliary aids and services. The name of the
current ADA Coordinator may be obtained via Dispatch.
Qualified Interpreter. An interpreter (usually someone approved by the Texas Commission for the
Deaf or equivalent organization) who is able to interpret effectively, accurately, and impartially both
receptively and expressively using any specialized vocabulary.
Certified Interpreter. A person who holds at least a Level III certification from the Texas
Commission for the Deaf.
Primary Consideration. The choice of auxiliary aids and services made by the individual that will
be honored unless there is confidence that there are equally effective means of communication.
TDD/TTY. "Telecommunication Device for the Deaf"/"Teletype". Allows user to send and receive
typed messages on an attached screen. May also be used as part of a "relay service" where a system
operator transfers the communication.
1. AVAILABILITY OF INTERPRETERS
Interpreters are always available. Instructions for obtaining their services are in the Emergency
Communications Division, Command Center, Central Jail booking office, and at all Police Stations.
2. PATROL/FIELD RESPONSE
Whether at the scene of a call for service or on-viewed incident or simply interacting with a member
of the public, upon becoming aware that a member of the public is deaf or hard of hearing,
department employees will focus on establishing effective communication. Primary consideration
should be given to the deaf or hard of hearing person's preferred choice of communication. While
this may require calling an interpreter to the scene if requested by the deaf or hard of hearing person,
effective communication may in some situations be achieved through a series of notes, gestures, and
lip reading.
Officers are encouraged to arrange interviews through a qualified interpreter to facilitate
communication. HPD employees or family members or friends of the person are not usually
considered qualified interpreters; however, they may be used in an emergency, in an innocuous
situation such as exchanging greetings, or with the approval of the deaf or hard of hearing person.
An officer issuing a common traffic citation generally may be able to effectively communicate using
notes and information obtained via documents produced by the driver. This would include routine
traffic accident investigation, but an interview with a qualified interpreter should be arranged for a
later mutually agreeable date and time to obtain a statement from a deaf or hard of hearing person
if it is a situation where a person without a hearing disability would be interviewed to complete the
investigation.
If an interview is necessary to establish probable cause for an arrest, a qualified interpreter will be
utilized. Likewise a qualified interpreter will be necessary if the facts surrounding the investigation
are complex and the deaf or hard of hearing person has not approved the use of other forms of
communication. When an interpreter is requested in cases where no immediate police action is
required, an interview will be scheduled for a later mutually agreeable date and time.
3. INVESTIGATION RESPONSE
Investigations may require the use of qualified interpreters in order to properly protect the rights of
the suspect and/or to ensure the accuracy of the information related to the investigation that is being
provided by a deaf or hard of hearing victim or witness.
Appropriate auxiliary aids and services, including a qualified interpreter will always be offered when
interviewing a deaf or hard of hearing complainant or witness. While the deaf or hard of hearing
person may approve the use of a family member or friend who is eighteen (18) years of age or older
to facilitate communication when filing a report, police personnel will arrange an interview with a
qualified interpreter if necessary to protect the integrity of the report.
The following situations will always require the use of a certified interpreter by scheduling an
interview at a mutually agreeable date and time:
The hearing-impaired person is:
- Involved in a major accident involving serious injuries.
- Suspected of a felony offense.
- Under arrest for any Class B misdemeanor or greater or for driving while intoxicated (DWI) and
is being given the statutory or DWI warning.
- Suspected of committing a serious offense and is being interrogated under conditions requiring
Miranda warnings.
- Being given an Intoxilyzer, blood or urine test.
- Giving an oral or sign-language statement.
A certified interpreter will also be used whenever a sworn statement is being obtained from a deaf
or hard of hearing person who is a complainant or witness.
4. JAIL SUPERVISOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES
All deaf or hard of hearing suspects being arrested shall only be booked into either the Central or
Southeast Jail facilities.
If the arresting and/or the transporting officer is aware that the suspect is deaf or hard of hearing, he
or she shall be responsible for advising the suspect of the reason for the arrest in the most effective
means of communication reasonably available. Likewise, if the arresting and/or transporting officer
is aware that the suspect is deaf or hard of hearing, he or she shall note on the arrest blotter and shall
verbally advise Jail personnel that the suspect is deaf or hard of hearing when placing the suspect
in custody of the Jail personnel.
Upon becoming aware that a person is deaf or hard of hearing, a supervisor will then be immediately
called so that the most appropriate form of communication for the booking process can be
determined. After giving primary consideration to the expressed wishes of the deaf or hard of
hearing person, a qualified interpreter will be immediately called in, if necessary, to provide general
information as to the nature of the arrest and the booking, housing, bonding and court processes.
When a deaf or hard of hearing person is being booked at a city jail, a Jail Division supervisor will:
- Immediately direct the person to the Medical Screening station.
- Advise the person of all charges and make the person aware of the various alternatives available
and make a TDD immediately available to the prisoner.
- Direct the deaf or hard of hearing person's attention to notices outlining that person's rights
including the name of the ADA Coordinator with whom a grievance may be filed.
- Try to contact the person's friends or relatives or a specific person if requested.
- Note on the person's Criminal History Record:
- The prisoner is deaf or hard of hearing.
- Whether or not the person requested an interpreter.
- The name of any interpreter used and the date and time the interpreter was contacted.
- Arrange visits between the deaf or hard of hearing prisoner and any authorized person.
- When applicable, ensure that the municipal courts are notified in writing that the prisoner is deaf
or hard of hearing and the prisoner's preferred auxiliary aid or service.
- Ensure that the Jailer(s) assigned to monitor the cell block where a deaf or hard of hearing
prisoner is housed makes full eye contact with the prisoner at each cell check to determine
whether the prisoner wishes to have access to a TDD/TTY or some other auxiliary aid or service.
- Ensure that all interactions with the deaf or hard of hearing person are properly documented as
required by Jail Division Operating Procedures.
5. DIVISION MANAGER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
Only division managers or their designees can authorize the use of certified interpreters. When a
certified interpreter is used, the interpreter will forward an invoice to the requesting division's
manager. Upon receipt of the payment invoice, the division manager will authorize payment and
immediately forward the invoice to the Office of Budget and Finance Division.
C.O. Bradford
Chief of Police
E X H I B I T B
["Commonly Asked Questions About the
Americans with Disabilities Act and Law Enforcement"]
E X H I B I T C
THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Houston Police Department does
not discriminate on the basis of disability in the operations of its programs, services, or activities.
Moreover, the City Police Department does not discriminate on the basis of disability in its hiring
or employment practices.
Here are some specific ways the City Police Department is implementing the ADA:
* The Police Department will operate its programs so that they are readily accessible to
and usable by individuals with disabilities.
* When a person with a hearing or vision impairment needs an auxiliary aid to make
communications effective, the Police Department will give primary consideration to the
person's choice of auxiliary aid.
* The Police Department will maintain a "telecommunication device for the deaf" (TDD)
at police stations.
* The Police Department will maintain a list of qualified interpreters who are available
on short notice to assist in the Department to communicate with people with hearing
impairments.
Questions, concerns, or requests for additional information regarding the ADA may be forwarded
to the City Police Department's ADA Compliance Coordinator. You can reach the Department's
ADA Compliance Coordinator by calling (713) 222-3131 (voice) or (713) 224-0675 (TDD) and
asking for the ADA Coordinator.
Individuals who need auxiliary aids for effective communication in programs and services are
invited to make their needs and preferences known to the ADA Compliance Coordinator.
For further information, call the Department of Justice's ADA Information Line at 1-800-514-0301 (voice) or 1-800-514-0383 (TDD).
E X H I B I T D
THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Houston's detention facilities do
not discriminate on the basis of disability in the operations of its programs, services, or activities.
Moreover, the City's detention facilities do not discriminate on the basis of disability in their hiring
or employment practices.
Here are some specific ways the City's detention facilities are implementing the ADA:
* When a detainee with a hearing or vision impairment needs an auxiliary aid to make
communications effective, the detention facility will give primary consideration to the person's
choice of auxiliary aid.
* The detention facilities will maintain "telecommunication devices for the deaf" (TDD), and
will ensure that detainees with hearing impairments have a right to access to telephone services
that is comparable to the access offered to detainees without hearing impairments.
* The detention facilities will maintain a list of qualified interpreters who are available on short
notice to assist the officers and staff in communicating with people with hearing impairments.
Questions, concerns, or requests for additional information regarding the ADA may be forwarded
to the City Police Department's ADA Compliance Coordinator. You can reach the Department's
ADA Compliance Coordinator by calling (713) 222-3131 (voice) or (713) 224-0675 (TDD) and
asking for the ADA Coordinator.
Individuals who need auxiliary aids for effective communication in programs and services are
invited to make their needs and preferences known to the ADA Compliance Coordinator.
E X H I B I T E
POLICY FOR INTERPRETING SERVICES IN JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
INVOLVING INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING
It is the policy of the City of Houston courts system that in those judicial proceedings where an
interpreter is necessary to ensure effective participation by any party, witness, juror, or spectator
who is deaf or hard of hearing, the courts system shall, upon reasonable notice, secure the services
of a qualified interpreter. A "qualified interpreter" is one who interprets effectively, accurately, and
impartially both receptively and expressively, using any necessary specialized vocabulary. The
courts system includes a justice, judge, or designated individual. This policy applies to those
situations where other auxiliary aids and services, such as real-time transcription, are not equally
effective means of communication or are unavailable. This policy does not apply to those situations
where providing interpreters to spectators creates an undue financial and administrative burden or
in a fundamental alteration in the nature of the service, program, or activity conducted by the courts.
Before determining the type of interpreting services to be secured, a court should confer with the
individual with a disability regarding the individual's preferred mode of communication (e.g.,
American Sign Language, Signed English, or oral interpreting). In determining what type of
auxiliary aid and service is necessary, the court should give primary consideration, 28 C.F.R. §
35.160(b)(2), to the requests of the individual with a disability. The court should then determine the
type of the services and the date, time, and place those services are required. The court should, at
its own expense, secure an interpreter(s) to provide those services.
Upon the date, place, and time noted, and prior to continuing with any proceeding, the court
should ask the individual, through the interpreter, whether the individual is confident that the
interpreter's skills ensure an adequate and accurate interpretation of the communication of the
proceeding, and whether the individual is confident of the interpreter's impartiality. If either of those
questions are answered in the negative, further efforts shall be made by the court to acquire the
services of a qualified interpreter. If those two questions are answered in the affirmative, the
court should ask the interpreter whether he or she is able to interpret the proceedings. The
proceedings shall continue unless the interpreter becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy the criteria
for a qualified interpreter, at which time a qualified interpreter shall be obtained. The determination
of whether an interpreter is qualified rests with the court.
The courts will also comply with Article 38.31 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,
"Interpreters for Deaf Persons."
To effectively communicate over the telephone, the court will maintain one or more
"telecommunication devices for the deaf" ("TDD"), and will train administrative staff on the proper
use of TDDs. Court employees may also communicate with people with hearing impairments
through the state's "relay service." Through the relay service, a court employee can speak to a
system operator, who then transfers those communications to the person with a hearing impairment
through a TDD.
There is a Municipal Court ADA Coordinator who is available to help members of the public
as well as Court judicial officers and employees who need assistance in interpreting the requirements
of the ADA and this policy statement. Notice of how to contact the ADA Coordinator will be
provided through pamphlets, posters, or other appropriate means.
If a person with a disability is dissatisfied with a court's proposed auxiliary aid or service, the
individual may file a grievance with the ADA Coordinator. The ADA Coordinator will attempt to
resolve the grievance within one week.
The City courts system shall notify individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing about the
availability of auxiliary aids and services to ensure effective participation, and
the procedures for securing them. The courts system shall distribute this information, for example,
at the information desk, through pamphlets, posters or other appropriate means.
E X H I B I T F
THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Houston Municipal Courts
system does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the operations of its programs, services,
or activities. Moreover, the City's Municipal Courts do not discriminate on the basis of disability
in its hiring or employment practices.
Here are some specific ways the Municipal Courts are implementing the ADA:
* An ADA Coordinator has been appointed, with the responsibility of working with people with
disabilities to ensure that the proper accommodations are provided.
* Ensuring that a qualified sign language interpreter is present in court whenever necessary to
ensure effective participation.
* The courts will confer with an individual with a disability regarding the individual's preferred
mode of communication (e.g., American Sign Language, Signed English or oral interpreting).
The courts will give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with a disability.
Questions, concerns, or requests for additional information regarding the ADA may be forwarded
to the Municipal Courts' ADA Coordinator:
[insert the person's name, title, office address, phone number, both voice and TDD, and
days/hours available].
Individuals with disabilities are invited to make their needs and concerns known to the ADA
Coordinator.