Technical Note
Potency of Cannabis Seized in Central Florida During June 2002
Christina
J. Newell
Florida Department of Law Enforcement
Orlando Regional Crime Laboratory
500 West Robinson Street
Orlando, FL 32801
[email: christy4n6@yahoo.com]
ABSTRACT: The potency of cannabis seized in central Florida during
the month of June, 2002, is reported.
9-Tetrahydrocannabinol
(
9-THC)
was extracted from cannabis seizures with a mixed methanol chloroform
solution, and then analyzed with gas chromatography using an external
standard. The average
9-THC
concentration was found to be 6.20%.
KEYWORDS:
9-Tetrahydrocannabinol,
9-THC,
Marijuana, Cannabis, Gas Chromatography
Introduction
Cannabis
remains one of the most frequently submitted substances for analysis
to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement's Orlando Regional Crime
Laboratory.
9-Tetrahydrocannabinol
(
9-THC)
is the substance responsible for most of the psychopharmacological effects
that cannabis has on humans. According to the University of Mississippi's
Potency Monitoring Project, the non-normalized average potency of cannabis
seizures has steadily increased since measurement began in the 1970's.
The average
9-THC
potencies were 0
90%
in 1977, 2
93%
in 1987, 4.53% in 1997, and 6.19% in 2002 (1). In this study, samples
were collected from seizures made in central Florida and submitted for
laboratory analysis during June 2002, and their respective
9-THC
contents determined by gas chromatography (GC) using an external standard.
Experimental
Instruments
and Materials
A
Hewlett Packard 5890 Gas Chromatograph (GC) with a flame ionization
detector was used for all analyses. The GC was equipped with an Alltech
(AT-1) fused silica 10-meter capillary column with an internal diameter
of 0.25 mm and having a film thickness of 0.20µm of methyl silicone.
A Mettler AE260 DeltaRange electronic analytical balance was used for
weighing the samples. The external
9-THC
standard employed was from Alltech (Lot Number 281). Methanol and chloroform
(both Fisher Scientific) were used as received. A total of 36 cannabis
samples obtained from 36 separate cases submitted to the laboratory
in June 2002 were examined in this study. All samples were dry.
Analytical
Protocol
After
removing seeds and large stem pieces, the samples (roughly 200 mg) were
weighed on an analytical balance (see Table 1,
below), then covered and soaked overnight in 5 mL of methanol/chloroform
9:1 to exhaustively extract the
9-THC
from the plant material (2). Because of the small size of the autosampler
vials used on the GC, a 1.5 mL aliquot of the extract of each sample
was evaporated to dryness in an autosampler vial, and another 1.5 mL
aliquot of extract was added and the vials were sealed; this doubled
the concentration of the extract. The
9-THC
external standard was prepared to a final concentration of 1.0 mg/mL.
The
GC was operated at a split ratio of 50:1. The helium flow rate was 1
mL/minute. The temperature program started at 100°C and was increased
at a rate of 50°C/minute to 325°C, with a final hold for 2.25
minutes. The samples were bracketed between two standards in groups
of ten. Each sample was injected in triplicate with a volume of 1 µL
per injection, and the average of the three peak areas for each sample
was used for quantitation. Five already extracted samples were chosen
randomly and the extraction and analysis procedures were repeated on
them to ensure that all of the samples had been exhaustively extracted
(which they were).
Results
and Discussion
The
amount of
9-THC
found in the samples ranged from 1.41% to 12.62% by dry weight (see
Table 1). The average
9-THC
content was 6.20%, which is almost identical to the 2002 value reported
by the University of Mississippi's Potency Monitoring Project. Since
there have been no other known studies of this type for cannabis seizures
in central Florida, these values cannot be compared with local data
to show a trend in cannabis potency. However, the results clearly suggest
that local cannabis potencies are closely tracking national averages.
Acknowledgments
Thanks
to the members of the Chemistry Section of the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement Orlando Regional Crime Laboratory for their assistance
with sample collection for this project. Special thanks to Dr. Frank
Davis, Orlando Regional Crime Laboratory, for assistance with formulation
of experimental methods and interpretation of results.
References