406
Customer Authorization
| |
A customer may authorize disclosure under section 3402(l) and section
3404
explains the procedures that must be followed. Customers may authorize
access
to identified records, for a period of no more than three months by
providing a
signed and dated statement to the financial institution and the government
authority. The customer may revoke such authorization at any time before
the
records are disclosed. The authorization must state the customer's rights
under
the Act and a customer may not be required to give an authorization as a
condition of doing business with a financial institution. The authority
must
identify the records sought and the purposes and agencies to which the
records
may be disclosed. Institutions must keep records of the agencies to which
customer-authorized access is granted; these records are open to inspection
by
customers. Although the statute may be read as implying that the customer
must
give authorization directly to the financial institution, practical
necessity
dictates that the government directly obtain the authorization and deliver
it to
the financial institution on behalf of the customer. Note: For maximum
efficiency, the customer authorization should specify all agencies
anticipated
to require access; the purpose should also be stated broadly.
While there is no legislative history on this point, it is the view of
the
Department that any named account holder of a joint account may authorize
government access to the account, such as either spouse in connection with a
husband and wife account or any partner in connection with a partnership
account.
Perhaps the most analogous rule of law supporting this conclusion is that
either
spouse can consent to a search of a premise or of an item held jointly by
husband
and wife (See United States v. Stone, 471 F.2d 170 (7th Cir.
1973),
cert. denied, 411 U.S. 931 (1973)) and that a partner may consent to
a
search of a partnership business premises. (See Gurleski v.
United States, 405 F.2d 253 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied,
395
U.S. 977 (1968).
| |