Skip to main content

History

Main Justice Now and Then, ENRD
Photo by ENRD

 

Ramsey Clark, AAG, Lands Division

Commenting on the forebear to the Natural Resource Section in 1963, Assistant Attorney General (AAG) Ramsey Clark asserted that its cases would become the most significant caseload in the Division’s future, stating that whether “in the year 2000 we will have, or not have, an invaluable heritage in resource preserves, parks, forests and other federal reservations” would be determined in part “through litigation,” which imposed special responsibilities on the Section’s lawyers.

AAG Clark further noted that the Section (then known as the General Litigation Section) was the “only federal agency which sees, or at least glimpses, all the land management activities of the federal government,” and that there was “concentrated in the Section a cumulative experience both with land use agencies and in litigation involving federal lands that is unequalled.” AAG Clark, The General Litigation Section, Lands Division Journal 1963, Vol. 1, pp. 42-44.

With the enactment of the National Environmental Policy Act and various other statutes affecting the protection and management of federal lands and resources in the 60’s and 70’s, the current docket of the General Litigation/Natural Resources Section fulfills AAG Clark’s prediction. It has responsibility for litigation arising under more than 60 federal statutes, involving a multitude of federal agencies and programs that go to the heart of federal land and resource management and protection.

The modern day Natural Resources Section is the result of a number of administrative changes in ENRD involving the creation, splitting off and merging of various different sections, and practice areas, and traces its beginnings from ENRD’s (then known as the Lands Division) Trial Section created in 1937.

From its creation in 1909 to 1937, the Lands Division was managed without any formal division into sections. In 1937 the work of the Division became complex enough that work was divided among six separate sections, one of which was the Trial Section, which had responsibility for all cases in the trial courts, except condemnation proceedings. The Trial Section’s docket included:

  • public lands cases, including those related to grazing, and quiet title actions;
  • boundary dispute cases;
  • cases involving water rights and reclamation; and
  • in addition to affirmative claims made on behalf of Native Americans as trustee, claims made by Native Americans against the United States.

In 1953, the water rights work of the Trial Section was assigned to its own separate section, the Water Resources Section. Also in 1953, an Indian Claims Section was created out of the Trial Section to handle that portion of the defensive Native American claims which would be brought under the Indian Claims Commission Act of 1946.

Subsequent developments have seen the re-merger of most of these dockets, and splitting off of others:

  • In 1960, the Trial Section and the Water Resources Section were consolidated under the name of the General Litigation Section.
  • In 1975, to handle the growing volume of cases involving water and property rights of Native Americans, the General Litigation’s responsibility for affirmative litigation on behalf of Native Americans was transferred to the newly created Indian Resources Section.
  • In 1981 General Litigation again assumed responsibility for Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas, coastal zone, and submerged lands litigation that had previously been transferred (1969) to the Marine Resources Section.
  • Also in 1981, General Litigation assumed responsibility for litigation which had previously been transferred (1980) to the Energy Section.
  • In 1986, the Indian Claims Section was merged into the General Litigation Section reconnecting this portion of the defensive docket.

In 2005 the name of the General Litigation Section was changed to the Natural Resources Section to more accurately identify its work with the mission of ENRD.

At the turn of the twenty first century, the worst drought in hundreds of years began in many areas of the western United States. This resulted in reduced water supplies, many of which are controlled by large water storage and delivery projects managed by the Bureau of Reclamation. The Natural Resources Section is responsible for defending litigation on behalf of Reclamation and has experienced a large increase is cases brought by various interests, including Tribal Nations, irrigators, and environmental organizations, who challenge the difficult water allocation decisions that must be made by Reclamation. 

In the past two decades, the Natural Resources Section has also seen a marked increase in two types of Fifth Amendment Takings cases. The potential for takings from periodic, temporary flooding was first recognized by the Supreme Court in Arkansas Game and Fish Comm’n v. United States, 568 U.S. 23 (2005). That decision has led to a large number of cases contending that flooding associated with natural disasters constitutes a taking of property by the United States. We also continue to manage an increasing number of cases arising out the Surface Transportation Board’s implementation of the National Rails System Act – a popular nationwide program that preserves idle railroad corridors and allows their interim use as hiking and biking trails.

Over the past decade, the Natural Resources Section’s work has also expanded to include defending federal approvals associated with renewable energy projects on public or federal lands, or funding of similar projects on non-federal land. This has included defending Bureau of Land Management leases for solar projects on public lands in the West; Bureau of Ocean Energy Management leases and operations approvals for offshore wind farms on the Outer Continental Shelf; and Department of Energy funding for renewable energy research and demonstration projects. 

Updated September 11, 2023